Publications related to Applied Clinical Research | HESP l Hearing and Speech Sciences Department l University of Maryland

Tinnemore, Doyle, and Goupell (2024) “Temporal speech cue perception in listeners with cochlear implants depends on the time between those cues and previous sound energy,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156, 2851-2859.
Anderson S, Cavaletti G, Hood LJ, Polydefkis M, Herrmann DN, Rance G, King B, McMichael AJ, Senna MM, Kim BS, Napatalung L, Wolk R, Zwillich SH, Schaefer G, Gong Y, Sisson M, Posner HB. A phase 2a study investigating the effects of ritlecitinib on brainst Pharmacology Res Perspec - 2024 - Anderson - A phase 2a study investigating the effects of ritlecitinib on brainstem.pdf2.83 MB
Zhou M, Soleimanpour R, Mahajan A, Anderson S. Hearing Aid Delay Effects on Neural Phase Locking. Ear Hear. 2024 Jan-Feb 01;45(1):142-150. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001408. Epub 2023 Jul 12 Hearing Aid Delay Effects.pdf1.45 MB
Ratner, N. (2024). "Augmenting Clinical Insights with Computing: How TalkBank has Impacted Assessment and Treatment of Speech and Language Disorders." Language Teaching Research 44 (2024): 31-40.
Blackmon, A., Goupell, M. J., Bakke, M., and Stakhovskaya, O. A. (2024) “Reduced memory spans and ear dominance using dichotic digits in bimodal cochlear-implant users,” JASA Express Lett. 054403.
Ezenwa, A. C., Goupell, M. J., and Gordon-Salant, S. (2024) “Cochlear-implant listeners benefit from training with time-compressed speech, even at advanced ages,” JASA Express Lett. 4, 054402.
Abramowitz, J. C., Goupell, M. J., and DeRoy Milvae, K. (2024). “Cochlear-implant simulated signal degradation exacerbates listening effort in older listeners,” Ear Hear. 45, 441-450.
Goupell, Cleary, and Bernstein. (2024). “Discussion of measurement and analysis techniques to estimate interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch for binaural perception, Re: Staisloff and Aronoff (2021). Comparing methods for pairing electrodes across ears with cochlear implants, Ear Hear., 42(5), 1218-1227,” Ear Hear. 45, 523-527.
Lelo de Larrea-Mancera, E. S., Stavropoulos, T., Carillo, A. A., Menon, K. N., Hoover, E. C., Eddins, D. A., Gallun, F. J., & Seitz, A. R. (2023). Validation of the Adaptive Scan method in the quest for time-efficient methods of testing auditoryprocesses. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 85, 2797–2810.
Cleary et al. (2022) “The relationship between interaural insertion-depth differences, scalar location, and interaural time-difference processing in adult bilateral cochlear-implant listeners,” Trends Hear. 26, 23312165221129165.
Tinnemore, A. R., Montero, L., Gordon-Salant, S., and Goupell, M. J. (2022) “The intelligibility of time-compressed speech as a function of age in listeners with cochlear implants or normal hearing,” Front. Aging. Neurosci. 14, 887581.
Goupell et al. (2022). “Computed-tomography estimates of interaural mismatch in insertion depth and scalar location in bilateral cochlear-implant users,” Otol. Neurotol. 43, 666-675.
Peng, Z. E., et al. [23 other authors]. (2022). Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics: Initial report of the P&P Task Force on Remote Testing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 151(5), 3116-3128.
Karawani H, Jenkins K, Anderson S. Neural Plasticity Induced by Hearing Aid Use. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 May 19;14:884917. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.884917. Neural plasticity induced by hearing aid use.pdf3.6 MB
Sandberg, C.W., Exton, E., Coburn, K.L., Chun, S., & Miller, C. (in press). Event related potential exploration of the organizational structure of abstract versus concrete words in neurologically intact younger adults. To appear in Brain and Language.
Bieber, R. E., Brodbeck, C., & Anderson, S. (2022). Examining the context benefit in older adults: A combined behavioral-electrophysiologic word identification study. Neuropsychologia, 170, 108224. Advance online publication.
Jaekel, B. J., Weinstein, S., Newman, R. S., and Goupell, M. J. (2022). “Impacts of device and signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 2898-2915.
Xie, Z., Anderson, S., and Goupell, M. J. (2022). “Stimulus context affects the perception of temporal cues in word segments in adult cochlear-implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 2149-2158.https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0009838
Gordon-Salant, S., Schwartz, MS, Oppler, KA & Yeni-Komshian, G. (2022). Detection and recognition of asynchronous auditory/visual speech: Effects of age, hearing loss, and talker accent. Front. Psychol., 28 January 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsy
Johnson, A A.; Bentley, D M.; Munson, B; Edwards, J. (2021). Effects of Device Limitations on Acquisition of the /t/-/k/ Contrast in Children With Cochlear Implants, Ear and Hearing, 43(2), 519-530.
White-Schwoch T, Anderson S, Krizman J, Bonacina S, Nicol T, Bradlow AR, Kraus N. (2021). Multiple Cases of Auditory Neuropathy Illuminate the Importance of Subcortical Neural Synchrony for Speech-in-noise Recognition and the Frequency-followingResponse. Ear and Hearing, 43(2), 605-619.
Rosen, B. and Goupell, M. J. (2022). “The effect of target and interferer frequency on across-frequency binaural interference of interaural-level-difference sensitivity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 924-938.
Singh, A., Wang, M. & Faroqi-Shah, Y. (2022). The influence of romanizing a non-alphabetic L1 on L2 reading: The case of Hindi-English visual word recognition. Reading and Writing, epub before print.
MacWhinney, B. & Bernstein Ratner, N. (accepted). Dynamic norming and open science. To appear in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
Martin, I. A., Goupell, M. J., and Huang, Y. T. (2022). “Children’s syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 699-711.