Publications | HESP l Hearing and Speech Sciences Department l University of Maryland

Mayo et al. (in press). “Wave interference at the contralateral ear helps explain non-monotonic envelope interaural time differences as a function of azimuth,” JASA Express Letters.
Johns et al. (2023). “Individual differences in speech stream segregation and working memory differentially predict performance on a stochastic figure-ground task,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 286-303.
Cleary et al. (2022) “The relationship between interaural insertion-depth differences, scalar location, and interaural time-difference processing in adult bilateral cochlear-implant listeners,” Trends Hear. 26, 23312165221129165.
Romeo, R.R., Perrachione, T.K., Olson, H.O., Halverson, K.K., Gabrieli, J.D.E., & Christodoulou, J.A. Socioeconomic dissociations in the neural and cognitive bases of reading disorders. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929322001189
Gibbs, B., II, Bernstein, J. G. W, Brungart, D., and Goupell, M. J. (2022). “Better-ear glimpsing in bilateral cochlear-implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 152, 1230-1246.
Tinnemore, A. R., Montero, L., Gordon-Salant, S., and Goupell, M. J. (2022) “The intelligibility of time-compressed speech as a function of age in listeners with cochlear implants or normal hearing,” Front. Aging. Neurosci. 14, 887581.
Goupell et al. (2022). “Computed-tomography estimates of interaural mismatch in insertion depth and scalar location in bilateral cochlear-implant users,” Otol. Neurotol. 43, 666-675.
Goupell, M. J. (2022). “Effect of age on across-frequency binaural interference of interaural-level-difference sensitivity,” Front. Aging Neurosci. 14, 887401.
Sisskin, V., & Goldstein, B. (2022). Avoidance reduction therapy for school-age children who stutter. In Seminars in speech and language (Vol. 43, No. 02, pp. 147-160). Thieme Medical Publishers.
Yang, J.S., Rosvold, C. & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2022). Measurement of lexical diversity in children's spoken language: computational and conceptual considerations. Volume 13, 905789.
Sandberg, C.W., Exton, E., Coburn, K.L., Chun, S., & Miller, C. (in press). Event related potential exploration of the organizational structure of abstract versus concrete words in neurologically intact younger adults. To appear in Brain and Language.
Bieber, R. E., Brodbeck, C., & Anderson, S. (2022). Examining the context benefit in older adults: A combined behavioral-electrophysiologic word identification study. Neuropsychologia, 170, 108224. Advance online publication.
Jaekel, B. J., Weinstein, S., Newman, R. S., and Goupell, M. J. (2022). “Impacts of device and signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 2898-2915.
Xie, Z., Anderson, S., and Goupell, M. J. (2022). “Stimulus context affects the perception of temporal cues in word segments in adult cochlear-implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 2149-2158.https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0009838
Gordon-Salant, S., Schwartz, MS, Oppler, KA & Yeni-Komshian, G. (2022). Detection and recognition of asynchronous auditory/visual speech: Effects of age, hearing loss, and talker accent. Front. Psychol., 28 January 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsy
Johnson, A A.; Bentley, D M.; Munson, B; Edwards, J. (2021). Effects of Device Limitations on Acquisition of the /t/-/k/ Contrast in Children With Cochlear Implants, Ear and Hearing, 43(2), 519-530.
White-Schwoch T, Anderson S, Krizman J, Bonacina S, Nicol T, Bradlow AR, Kraus N. (2021). Multiple Cases of Auditory Neuropathy Illuminate the Importance of Subcortical Neural Synchrony for Speech-in-noise Recognition and the Frequency-followingResponse. Ear and Hearing, 43(2), 605-619.
DeVries, L., Anderson, S., Goupell, M. J., Smith, E., and Gordon-Salant, S. (2022). “Effects of aging and hearing loss on perceptual and electrophysiological pulse rate discrimination,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 1639-1650.
Rosen, B. and Goupell, M. J. (2022). “The effect of target and interferer frequency on across-frequency binaural interference of interaural-level-difference sensitivity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 924-938.
Singh, A., Wang, M. & Faroqi-Shah, Y. (2022). The influence of romanizing a non-alphabetic L1 on L2 reading: The case of Hindi-English visual word recognition. Reading and Writing, epub before print.
MacWhinney, B. & Bernstein Ratner, N. (accepted). Dynamic norming and open science. To appear in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
Martin, I. A., Goupell, M. J., and Huang, Y. T. (2022). “Children’s syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 151, 699-711.
Ovans, Z., Hsu, N.S., Bell-Souder, D., Gilley, P., Novick, J.M., & Kim, A.E. (in press). Cognitive control states influence real-time sentence processing as reflected in the P600 ERP. To appear in Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience.
Shader, M. J., Kwon, B. J., Gordon-Salant, S, and Goupell, M. J. (2022). “Open-set phoneme recognition performance with varied temporal cues in younger and older cochlear-implant users,” J. Sp. Lang. Hear. Res. 65, 1196-1211.
Shah & Wereley (2022). Investigation of code-switching cost in conversation and self-paced reading. International Journal of Bilingualism. DOI 10.1177/13670069211056438