Skip to main content

Home

  • Pinterest
  • HESP InTERPretation Blog
  • HESP YouTube
  • Instagram
  • About Us
    • Welcome to HESP
    • People
    • HESP Initiatives
    • Diversity and Inclusion Efforts in HESP
    • Campus Location
    • Department Policies
  • Undergraduate
    • Welcome to our Undergraduate Program!
    • How To Declare
    • Resources and Opportunities for Students
    • Graduation and Preparation for Graduate School
  • Graduate
    • Welcome to our Graduate Programs!
    • Prospective Students
    • Current Students
    • Resources and Opportunities for Students
    • Graduation
  • Research
    • Applied Clinical Research
    • Assistive Technology-Rehab for Speech, Language, and Hearing
    • Cognitive Neuroscience and Communication Disorders
    • Communication and Communication Disorders Across the Life Span
  • Clinic
  • About Us
    • Welcome to HESP
    • People
    • HESP Initiatives
    • Diversity and Inclusion Efforts in HESP
    • Campus Location
    • Department Policies
  • Undergraduate
    • Welcome to our Undergraduate Program!
    • How To Declare
    • Resources and Opportunities for Students
    • Graduation and Preparation for Graduate School
  • Graduate
    • Welcome to our Graduate Programs!
    • Prospective Students
    • Current Students
    • Resources and Opportunities for Students
    • Graduation
  • Research
    • Applied Clinical Research
    • Assistive Technology-Rehab for Speech, Language, and Hearing
    • Cognitive Neuroscience and Communication Disorders
    • Communication and Communication Disorders Across the Life Span
  • Clinic
Enter the terms you wish to search for.

Publications related to Communication and Communication Disorders Across the Life Span

HESP Clinic
  • Cychosz, M., Erskine, M., Munson, B. & Edwards, J. (2021). A lexical advantage in four-year-old children's word repetition. J. Child Language, 48(1), 31-54.
  • DeRoy Milvae, K., Kuchinsky, S. E., Stakhovskaya, O. A., and Goupell, M. J. (2021) “Dichotic listening performance and effort as a function of spectral resolution,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 150, 920-935.
  • Galek, K., Bice E., Marquez, G. Tongue and lip comparisons between healthy and non-dysphagic post-stroke individuals. To appear in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
  • Morini*, G. M. & Newman, R. S. (2021). A comparison of monolingual and bilingual toddlers’ word recognition in noise. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(5), 1446-1459
  • Newman, R. S., Shroads, E. A., Johnson, E. K., Kamdar, J., Morini, G., Onishi, J., Smith, E. & Tincoff, R. (2021). Introducing BITTSy: The Behavioral Infant & Toddler Testing System. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 2604-2614https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01583-9.
  • Cychosz, M., Edwards, J., Ratner, N. B., Eaton, C. T., & Newman, R. S. (2021). Acoustic-lexical characteristics of child-directed speech between 7 and 24 months and their impact on toddlers' phonological processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:71264https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/djkms
  • Blomquist, C., Newman, R. S., Huang, Y. T., & Edwards, J. (2021). Children with cochlear implants use semantic prediction to facilitate spoken word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(5), 1636-1649. Blomquist et al. (2021)_1.pdf693.24 KB
  • Mallikarjun*, A., Shroads, E., & Newman, R. S. (2021). The role of linguistic experience in the development of the consonant bias. Animal Cognition, 24(3), 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01436-6.
  • Kapnoula, E.C., Edwards, J.,& McMurray, B. (2021). Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 47(4), 578-595.
  • Jaekel, B. N., Weinstein, S., Newman, R. S., and Goupell, M. J. (2021) “Access to semantic cues does not promote perceptual restoration of interrupted speech in cochlear-implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 149, 1488-1497.
  • Jensen, K. K., Cosentino, S., Bernstein, J. G. W., Stakhovskaya, O. A., and Goupell, M. J. (2021). “A comparison of place-pitch-based interaural electrode matching methods in bilateral cochlear-implant users,” Trends Hear. 25, 1-21.
  • Johnson, K. C., Xie, Z., Shader, M. J., Mayo, P. G., and Goupell, M. J. (2021) “Effect of chronological age on pulse rate discrimination in adult cochlear-implant users,” Trends Hear. 25, 1-15.
  • Yun, D., Jennings, T. R., Kidd Jr., G., and Goupell, M. J. (2021) “Benefits of acoustic beamforming for bilateral cochlear-implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 149, 3052-3072.
  • Goupell, M. J., Eisenberg, D., and DeRoy Milvae, K. (2021). “Dichotic listening performance with cochlear-implant simulations of ear asymmetry is consistent with difficulty ignoring clearer speech,” Atten. Perc. Psych. 83, 2083-2101.
  • Heffner, C. C., Newman, R. S. & Idsardi, W. (2021). Action at a distance: Long-distance rate adaptation in event perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(2), 312-325. doi: 10.1177/1747021820959756. Heffner et al. (2021).pdf935.67 KB
  • Byrd, A. S., & Brown, J. A. (2021). An interprofessional approach to dialect-shifting instruction for early elementary school students. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(1), 139-148.
  • Maher, Z. K., Erskine, M. E., Byrd, A. S., Harring, J. F. & Edwards, J. R. (2021). African American English and Early Literacy: A comparison of approaches to quantifying nonmainstream dialect use. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(1),118-130.
  • Goupell, M. J., Draves, G., and Litovksy, R. Y. (2020). “Understanding vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults,” PLOS ONE. 15, 1-11. Goupell et al. (2020) - Vocoded Speech in Kids and Adults.pdf1.24 MB
  • Gerhold, K., Eaton, C. T., Newman, R. S., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2020). Early phonological predictors of toddler language outcomes. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 72(6), 442-453.
  • Hsu, N. S., Kuchinsky, S. E., & Novick, J. M. (2020). "Direct impact of cognitive control on sentence processing and comprehension." Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.
  • Newman, R. S., Kirby, L. A., Von Holzen, K. & Redcay, E. (2021) Read my lips! Perception of speech in noise by preschool children with autism and the impact of watching the speaker’s face. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 13(1), 4
  • Raneri, D., Von Holzen, K., Newman, R. S., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2020). Change in maternal speech rate to preverbal infants over the first two years of life. Journal of Child Language., 47(6), 1263-1275
  • Tinnemore, A. R., Gordon-Salant, S., and Goupell, M. J. (2020) “Audiovisual speech recognition with a cochlear implant and increased perceptual and cognitive demands,” Trends Hear. 24, 1-17.
  • Misurelli, S., Goupell, M. J., Burg, E., Jocewicz, R., Kan, A., and Litovsky, R. Y. (2020) “Auditory attention and spatial unmasking in children with cochlear implants,” Trends Hear. 24, 1-11.
  • Shader, M. J., Gordon-Salant, S, and Goupell, M. J. (2020). “The impact of aging and peripheral neural survival on temporal processing ability in cochlear-implant users: Gap detection thresholds,” Trends Hear. 24, 1-13.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Current page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences
University of Maryland, 0100 Samuel J. LeFrak Hall
7251 Preinkert Dr., College Park, MD 20742
Main Office: 301-405-4213 ♦ Clinic: 301-405-4218
Email: hesp_bus_request [at] umd.edu ♦ Contact Us ♦ Accreditation

  • Give to Hearing and Speech Sciences
  • Alumni Listserv & Newsletter
  • HESP Research
  • Meet Our Faculty
  • College Directory
  • UMD Web Accessibility
University of Maryland 1856 - College of Behavioral & Social Sciences

Login / Logout